Archives for February 2023

Photo Inspires Sumi Ink Portrait by Eugene Gregan

john-steinbeck-sumi-ink-by-eugene-gregan

Undated Sumi ink portrait of John Steinbeck by Eugene Gregan

A photograph Thom Steinbeck admired of his father inspired the expressive, high-energy Sumi ink brush painting of John Steinbeck seen here. It’s by the American artist Eugene Gregan and was done in the early 1980s. “Thom showed me the photograph and asked if I would do a drawing from it,” recalls Gregan. “Thom liked the drawing, and that led to a series of Sumi ink portraits.”

john-steinbeck-drawing-by-eugene-gregan

Undated drawing of John Steinbeck by the same artist

Sumi ink is made from natural substances mixed with gelatin and is traditionally used by artists in China and Japan. One of Gregan’s spontaneous ink portraits, this one from life, was of Thom Steinbeck himself. As in the Sumi ink portrait of the elder Steinbeck, it exudes vitality and passion. (Note Thom’s approving inscription in the lower left corner: “Authorized: Thomas Steinbeck.”) Gregan, who knew Elaine Steinbeck but not John, is a student and teacher of Oriental brush painting. The portraits were created, he said, on specially ordered “beautiful handmade paper from China.”

thom-steinbeck-sumi-ink-by-eugene-gregan

Gregan’s Sumi ink painting of Thom Steinbeck

Thom Steinbeck may have liked the photograph, the initial drawing, and the Sumi portraits because his father looks ready for battle in all of them, though much more so in the Sumi versions. This Steinbeckian force had already inspired Gregan. “I saw John Steinbeck introduce one of his movies on television a long time ago,” he says. I got more out of that than anything—his presence was monumental. He had that powerful voice and personality. And so did Johnny and Thom.”

Eugene Gregan and the Commune at Lookout Farm

eugene-greganGregan and Steinbeck’s sons, John Ernst Steinbeck IV (whom Gregan refers to as Johnny) and Thomas Myles Steinbeck, were friends for years. Gregan, who is 84, remained close to the brothers from just after the end of the Vietnam War until their deaths. He feels that both participated in the war to please their father. “We all lived in the same commune in the Catskills,” remembers Gregan. “A place we called Lookout Farm. I moved up from Brooklyn. There were a lot of interesting people in the area, including Ram Dass.” Adds Gregan: “Johnny built a sound studio there, and Thom, who was also a talented designer, designed a scale model of the Swiss Family Robinson house for Walt Disney—it was the model for the structure subsequently constructed at Disneyland.”

Energized by communal life, the three friends joined forces to try to make films of John Steinbeck stories. But they soon realized, after knocking on producers’ doors, that the project wouldn’t succeed without name directors or actors backing it. The Steinbeck name alone was not enough. So when Thom wrote a screenplay treatment of The Pearl, he managed to get it to a name director: Steven Spielberg. “The screenplay was absolutely fabulous,’’ Gregan recalls. “Spielberg liked it but said the young boy couldn’t die at the end in the film—typical Spielberg.’’ Thom Steinbeck wasn’t willing to compromise.

Johnny died in 1991, Thom in 2016. Gregan said he and Thom ”closed’’ a lot of New York bars over the years. “He could light up a place with his presence. He was a great story teller.’’

Eugene Gregan studied under Josef Albers and Norman Ives at Yale and taught at the Rhode Island School of Design. He has exhibited internationally. Collectors of his work have included Miles Davis, John Lennon, Yoko Ono, Robert Mitchum, Ram Dass, Judd Hirsh, Julie Christie, and Calvin Klein. His home today is not far from the old commune in the mountains. There he continues to paint while work proceeds on a film documentary of his life. His wife Beverly keeps a famously beautiful garden known to inspire poets and painters—including, of course, Gregan. He has a saying: “Invest in beauty. It is a great antidote to fear.” That beauty can include Sumi ink brush paintings of gardens, landscapes, and people—including a couple of expressively energized Steinbecks.

A Steinbeck Vade Mecum by Steinbeck’s Great Evangelist

robert-demott

The November 2022 publication of Steinbeck’s Imaginarium was propitious. Its publisher, the University of New Mexico Press, published Steinbeck and His Critics: A Record of Twenty-Five Years in 1957, when Steinbeck was still in touch with “Skunkfoot Hill,” his boyhood rival from Salinas, who chaired UNM’s department of anthropology. Its author, Robert DeMott, is Professor Emeritus of American literature and creative writing at Ohio University, and a major force in Steinbeck scholarship; Steinbeck’s Imaginarium is his valedictory to the community and field of study he helped create. Chapter subjects indicate the book’s range and variety (“Half a Century with Steinbeck,” the writing of Cannery Row, Steinbeck’s journals, Steinbeck and fly-fishing). But the subtitle (“Essays on Writing, Fishing, and Other Critical Matters”) seriously understates the book’s importance to the future of Steinbeck studies. A deep dive into texts, contexts, and connections, Steinbeck’s Imaginarium is certain to become a vade mecum for serious students of Steinbeck in need of a friendly guide.

John Steinbeck’s Gravitational Pull

DeMott’s preface describes his sense of connection to Steinbeck’s life and writing, and his purpose in pursuing both as the chief work of a 50-year career:

For me, the Matter of Steinbeck—by which I mean not just his writings but the overall body of his work, the allied collection of diverse historical, personal, creative, and intellectual materials that make up his achievement and offered possibilities for sustain investigation into his life and career—was never solely a bloodless investigation into his life and career, nor a way to mark academic time and advancement . . . but an attempt to understand and communicate one writer’s important literary, social, and ecological vision that gathered strength, urgency, and relevance as the years went on. Steinbeck’s gravitational pull got stronger over the decades, not weaker.

steinbecks-imaginariumThe fruits of the author’s passion for the Matter of Steinbeck, in all its forms, have proven to be abundant. They include Steinbeck’s Reading and Steinbeck’s Typewriter, a pair of books that provide helpful lists and important insights into the process of Steinbeck’s reading and writing; After The Grapes of Wrath, a collection of essays with Donald Coers and Paul Ruffin; and critical editions of major works by Steinbeck for Penguin Books and the Library of America: To a God Unknown, Novels and Stories 1932-1937, Novels 1942-1952, The Grapes of Wrath, Sweet Thursday, Travels with Charley and Later Novels 1947-1962 (with Brian Railsback), and Working Days: The Journals of The Grapes of Wrath 1938-1941. Seminars taught and dissertations directed at Ohio University have produced stars like Railsback, founding dean of the honors college at Western Carolina University, and David M. Wrobel, dean of arts and sciences at the University of Oklahoma. DeMott’s directorship of San Jose State University’s Steinbeck Studies Center, early in the center’s development, resulted in the acquisition of one-of-a-kind documents and artifacts, including Steinbeck’s Hermes typewriter. Steinbeck’s Imaginarium builds on this history of scholarly energy, enterprise, and collaboration. But DeMott insists that there is still unfinished Steinbeck business to be done by a new generation. His to-do list for the future includes an unexpurgated edition of Steinbeck’s letters, collected  editions of Steinbeck’s journals and unpublished works, and a volume of Steinbeck iconography and artifacts, like the one on Ernest Hemingway organized by Michael Katakis, Hemingway’s literary executor, in 2018.

Student Scholars in Search of a Mission

But the data provided in DeMott’s survey of conferences devoted to Steinbeck, starting in 1969, raises a troubling issue: the decline in participation, and thus stature, at Steinbeck events. The first such conference, held at the University of Connecticut, celebrated The Grapes of Wrath and featured literary lights like Malcolm Cowley, Granville Hicks, Hyatt Waggoner, Ted Hayashi, Peter Lisca, and Warren French. The Oregon State University conference of 1970, organized by Richard Astro, got the Steinbeck-ecology ball rolling, with Joel Hedgpeth, Jackson Benson, John Ditsky, Robert Morsberger, and Steinbeck’s pal Toby Street in attendance. “Steinbeck Country,” the 1971 conference at San Jose State University, attracted 800 attendees and spurred DeMott’s “fascination for visiting the physical places that inspire literary and artistic works.” Conferences held at San Jose State in 2013, 2016, and 2019 attracted far fewer, despite some effort to encourage student scholars. Steinbeck’s Imaginarium can help rectify this situation if it is taken to heart by this critical audience: young scholars looking for a mission, like Robert DeMott 50 years ago. His reading of Steinbeck texts and contexts—along with detailed notes, lists, and surveys of people, places, and events—provides the necessary information. His personal way of “being in the world” with John Steinbeck—a fellow fisherman, poet, and evangelist for human understanding—should provide the inspiration.