Cancel Culture Targets Of Mice and Men—Again

john-steinbeck-of-mice-and-men

America’s cancel-culture movement has caught up with the school district of Newfane, the rural community in upstate New York where a student named Madison Woodruff complained recently about having to read John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men, the 1937 novella-play in which the writer explored racism, sexism, and ageism in rural California 100 years ago. A February 2, 2021 report in the Lockport Union Sun & Journal gives the 16-year-old’s reason for objecting to a book that might make her “uncomfortable”: “My main concern is that kids are feeling uncomfortable, and I feel uncomfortable, and I feel if you’re reading a book in school, where school is supposed to be a safe place, you can’t make kids feel uncomfortable because of a book we’re reading.” Citing the December 2020 decision by school district officials in Mendota Heights, Minnesota to remove Of Mice and Men (“the second most frequently banned book in the public school curriculum in the 1990s”), following complaints by parents and staff at Henry Sibley High School, the report quotes Newfane’s high school principal statement in response to Woodruff: “literature is a way to ‘confront’ bigotry.”

Like Shakespeare, John Steinbeck Can Create Discomfort

nick-taylorAlso quoted in the article is Nick Taylor, director of the Martha Heasley Cox Center for Steinbeck Studies and professor of English at San Jose State University, who defended Steinbeck’s right to be candid and the reader’s right to be uncomfortable. “She’s absolutely justified in having these feelings,” said Taylor: “I think Steinbeck would’ve said she was completely justified, though he would’ve added, ‘And that’s entirely my point.” Two days after the report appeared, the paper published a letter from a former student who credited her Newfane English teacher with introducing her to another comfort-challenging author: “I always felt safe in school no matter what our assignment was. I had a brilliant English teacher and when I was Madison’s age he introduced us to Shakespeare, who wrote comedies, tragedies, sonnets and poems, and historical works. Shakespeare is the most-recognized playwright in the world. His works could make you feel uncomfortable if you chose to interpret them that way.”

Lead photo: Lon Cheney and Burgess Meredith as George and Lenny in Lewis Milestone’s 1939 film version of John Steinbeck’s 1939 classic. Photo of Nick Taylor courtesy Martha Heasley Cox Center for Steinbeck Studies.

John Steinbeck Awardees Discuss “Giving Back”

jose-andres-sean-penn

A pair of celebrity philanthropists with marquee humanitarian projects and progressive political agendas will discuss “Giving Back” in a live-stream event that will end with one receiving the 2020 John Steinbeck Award, given by the Martha Heasley Cox Center for Steinbeck Studies “to honor an artist, thinker, activist who has made a significant contribution to causes that matter to the common person.” Sponsored by the Commonwealth Club of California, the online event features master chef and World Central Kitchen founder José Andrés, recipient of this year’s award, and the actor Sean Penn, who won in 2004. Tickets to the November 30 live-stream are $5.00 for Commonwealth Club members and $10.00 for non-members.

Composite image of José Andrés and Sean Penn courtesy Commonwealth Club of California.

The Best Introduction to Steinbeck’s Greatest Decade

david-wrobel-grapes-of-wrath

The Western History Association, a professional society for scholars of the American West, was founded in 1961, the year John Steinbeck published his final novel, The Winter of Our Discontent, and wrote the final version of Travels with Charley, the work of “creative nonfiction” that continues to attract readers, and controversy, 60 years after Steinbeck’s road trip in search of an America he said he no longer understood. The Western history organization planned to hold its annual meeting in Albuquerque this year; fortunately for fans of John Steinbeck, having to meet online instead meant that the association’s October 14, 2020 presidential address by David Wrobel is now available to anyone looking for the best video introduction to John Steinbeck’s greatest decade of writing, from In Dubious Battle, “The Harvest Gypsies,” Of Mice and Men, and The Grapes of Wrath to The Moon Is Down and Cannery Row. Watch “Steinbeck Country and the America West” and find out how this writing became a British-born historian’s “window on the American West and nation,” from the New Deal to the Great Society—and how “Jeffersonian agrarian myopia” led to “racial blindness” in The Grapes of Wrath, and “creative fictions” about Oklahoma by the author of Travels with Charley.

Image of David Wrobel courtesy of the University of Oklahoma.

IrishCentral Reposts Jim Dwyer’s Essay on the Irish Life of John Steinbeck

jim-dwyer-princeton-university

Timed to coincide with the October 13 publication of Mad at the World, Bill Souder’s critically acclaimed life of John Steinbeck, the website IrishCentral’s repost of a 2002 profile of Steinbeck by the late Jim Dwyer serves to remind readers that Ireland, like California, came to love Steinbeck more in death than in life. A Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter and columnist for the New York Times, Dwyer—who died on October 8 at the age of 63—was described as the “conscience of New York” in an October 10 obituary by WNYC’s Jim O’Grady. Writing for Irish America magazine on the occasion of Steinbeck’s centennial, Dwyer drew from East of Eden, and a 1953 essay Steinbeck wrote about Ireland for Collier’s Weekly, to trace the Irish strain in Steinbeck’s self-mythologizing back to the Derry farming village of Ballykelly, birthplace of Samuel Hamilton, the semi-mythic grandfather who haunted Steinbeck’s imagination and the pages of his most autobiographical novel. “Beyond the clear lines of genealogy,” observed Dwyer, “there is the sensibility of a man who cherished the land, saw magic in places, and gazed without blinking at the brutality that closes the circle of farm life—much like Seamus Heaney, another son of Derry.”

Photo of Jim Dwyer courtesy of Princeton University.

This is the 500th post at SteinbeckNow.com since its founding seven years ago.—Ed.  

 

 

William Souder, University of Oklahoma Experts Launch Steinbeck Center Series

pulitzer-prize-finalist-william-souder

Michele Speich, executive director of the National Steinbeck Center in Salinas, California, has announced a pair of public program initiatives with upcoming target dates. “We are kicking off our fall with a brand-new WebCast series called the NSC Inspiration Series,” explained Speich. “These WebCast events will happen once a month and will feature interviews with authors, scholars, musicians, artists, and more and will focus upon the inspirations that fuel their work, especially if part of that inspiration comes from John Steinbeck.”

john-steinbeck-center-series

On October 21, William Souder will give a book-launch talk on Mad at the World, his long-awaited life of John Steinbeck, scheduled for release by W.W. Norton and Company on October 13. On October 22, the first installment of a quarterly series called Steinbeck Conversations will feature David M. Wrobel, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Oklahoma. Joining Wrobel to discuss “Getting History Right” in understanding John Steinbeck will be Pete Peterson, Dean of the School of Public Policy at Pepperdine University, and Wilfred “Bill” McClay, Director of the Center for the History of Liberty at the University of Oklahoma.

Follow the links to register for these events, both of which are free.

Supreme Court “Declines to Get Involved” in John Steinbeck Family Dispute

supreme-court-new-york-times

According to a report from the Associated Press, “The Supreme Court is leaving in place a decision awarding the late John Steinbeck’s stepdaughter $5 million in a family dispute over abandoned plans for movies of some of Steinbeck’s best-known works.” On October 5 “the high court said it would not take up the dispute involving the Nobel Prize-winning author’s stepdaughter Waverly Kaffaga, his late son Thomas Steinbeck and his daughter-in-law Gail Steinbeck.”

This outcome was predicted by observers following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a vigorous advocate for extending creative copyright protections beyond existing limits. For readers unfamiliar with the background of the story, here is the full text of the AP report:

The author of “The Grapes of Wrath” died in 1968 and legal wrangling among his heirs has continued for decades. When he died, Steinbeck left the vast majority of his estate to Kaffaga’s mother Elaine, his third wife. Each of his two sons got $50,000. Legal wrangling ensued and has continued despite agreements between the parties over royalties and control of Steinbeck’s works. In the case the Supreme Court declined to get involved in, Kaffaga alleged that Thomas Steinbeck and his wife had continued to claim various rights in Steinbeck works despite losses in court. That, she said, led multiple Hollywood producers to abandon negotiations with her to develop screenplays for remakes of “The Grapes of Wrath” and “East of Eden.” A jury in Los Angeles awarded her a total of $13 million and an appeals court upheld the verdict in 2019 but struck down $8 million in punitive damages.

Photograph courtesy of the New York Times.

Wall Street Journal Review by Sam Sacks Draws Deeply on Life of John Steinbeck

john-steinbeck-wall-street-journal

“Poison Cup of Gold”—the October 1, 2020 Wall Street Journal review of William Souder’s new life of John Steinbeck, by Sam Sacks—further escalated pre-publication enthusiasm for Mad at the World, the first full-length life of John Steinbeck since the biography by Jay Parini 25 years ago. Like other reviews of Souder’s book, Sacks’s Wall Street Journal essay heaps praise on its readable style, copious research, and psychological insight into a born writer at war with himself. “Some writers are content to write nothing until they have something they need to say,” says Sacks, who writes with wit in both senses of the term: “Steinbeck was the opposite.” Unlike other large-circulation reviews, Sacks’s extraordinarily perceptive account of Steinbeck’s career and Souder’s treatment draws on the work of literary scholars like Susan Shillinglaw and Jackson Benson. “Mr. Benson’s monumental 1984 biography, written across 15 years and nearing 1,200 pages, hangs over Mr. Souder’s endeavor,” notes Sacks, who also describes Steinbeck as “a world-class listener” and Travels with Charley as “a collection of stories masquerading as fiction.” The entire essay is worth reading, but a sample must suffice:

It’s common enough to read about authors whose lives are at odds with their work, but has there ever been one so profoundly in conflict with his own personality? Steinbeck is one of America’s few bona fide literary celebrities—perhaps only Twain and Hemingway enjoyed more international renown—yet he was horrified by public exposure and detested his fame, taking every opportunity to undermine it. Two clashing impulses provide the tension in Mr. Souder’s book: Steinbeck’s deep-seated distrust of success and the unyielding creative passion that brought his success about.

Sam Sacks is a literary critic and editor in New York. His literary criticism has appeared in Harper’s, London Review of Books, New Republic, Commentary, Weekly Standard, Prospect, Music and Literature, and The New Yorker. He has written the Fiction Chronicle column for the Wall Street Journal since 2010.

Illustration by Greg Newbold courtesy of the Wall Street Journal.

Praise for William Souder’s New Life of John Steinbeck from the Washington Post

mad-at-the-world

Mad at the World, the new life of John Steinbeck by biographer William Souder, continues to attract pre-publication praise, most recently in an October 1 Washington Post review by Alexander J. Kafka, senior editor at The Chronicle of Higher Education. Describing Souder’s work as “painstakingly researched, psychologically nuanced, unshowy, lucid,” and perfectly fitted in style to its psychologically challenged subject, Kafka speculates that, while “Ernest Hemingway loomed large as a figure of comparison” with John Steinbeck when both writers were alive, “Steinbeck might be considered a more American-centered version of Hemingway” today, almost six decades later. Noting that Steinbeck’s “charming and bogus” 1962 travel book Travels with Charley “masqueraded as reporting but was mostly another reach of [Steinbeck’s] imagination,” the Washington Post review concludes that “Souder, in his own humble style, has brought a deeply human Steinbeck forth in all his flawed, melancholy, brilliant complication.”

nick-taylor-double-switchMad at the World: A Life of John Steinbeck will be released by W.W. Norton and Company on October 13. Steinbeck Review subscribers are invited to register for an October 19 reading and conversation with William Souder led by Nicholas Taylor (left), professor of creative writing and director of the Martha Heasley Cox Center for Steinbeck Studies at San Jose State University.

John Steinbeck Drives Humor in Political Cartoon

signe-wilkinson-grapes of wrath

Writing about the prickly presidential election cycle of 1960, John Steinbeck was prepared to find the humor in politics and, when also writing about his favorite comic strip, “Li’l Abner,” the politics in humor as well. Steinbeck died a month after Richard Nixon’s election in 1968, but if he were still alive he would likely be laughing at this September 20, 2020 political cartoon by Signe Wilkinson. Showing two carloads of families in flight but coming from opposite directions—one from West Coast fire, the other from East Coast weather—it drives its point home with the caption “Grapes of Wrath, 2020.” A Pulitzer Prize-winning political cartoonist at the Philadelphia Inquirer, Wilkinson clearly enjoys irony à la Steinbeck. “This year, with smoke from the western fires reaching D.C., Congress should start addressing our own environmental problems,” she explained. “It’s in everyone’s best interests. Republicans certainly wouldn’t want fleeing Californians invading their states.”

Image courtesy Signe Wilkinson/Philadelphia Inquirer.

New York Times Preview Praises Mad at the World; Bookpage.com Agrees

mad-at-the-world

Although Mad at the World: A Life of John Steinbeck won’t be released until October 13, a pair of publications with literary reach have picked William Souder’s scholarly new Steinbeck biography out of their fall lineup in previews that bode well for the book’s reception by readers. Writing in the September 24 New York Times, Joumana Khatib praised the balance, scope, and timeliness of the first full-length life of John Steinbeck to appear in a generation:

A comprehensive new biography of America’s best-known novelist of the Great Depression arrives at a timely moment. Though Steinbeck’s books remain his most significant literary output, Souder also dives into Steinbeck’s life as a journalist, including overseas postings during World War II and the Vietnam War, and how they shaped his worldview. And he doesn’t shy away from Steinbeck’s vices — philandering, heavy drinking — along with the feelings of inferiority that haunted him throughout his career.

A Life for Our Time of “the Novelist for Our Time”

In an October 2020 Bookpage.com feature post, reviewer Harry L. Carrigan agreed with Khatib’s assessment. “John Steinbeck just might be the novelist for our time,” Carrigan concluded, and “as vibrantly illuminated by Mad at the World,” Steinbeck’s reputation for relevance is rooted in a pair of works he said he felt compelled to write as a warning to his sons and country:

In his sprawling epic The Grapes of Wrath, he captured Americans’ peculiar yearning for a life not their own, the promise of wealth beyond the veil of desolation and the wretched impossibility of such a promise. Steinbeck’s other epic, East of Eden, illustrates the ragged desperation of human nature, wreaking destruction rather than carrying hope. William Souder’s bracing Mad at the World: A Life of John Steinbeck vividly portrays the brooding and moody writer who could never stop writing and who never fit comfortably into the society in which he lived.